Telechron Forums
September 09, 2010, 12:52:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: 22 January 2010 - Updated forums to v. 1.1.11 --Morbo
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 08:27:59 AM 
Started by dsadowski - Last post by Boinker
RARE Sohm Master Regulator Clock Chicago circa 1922 (eBay auction #160477923616)

I recently sold this clock on eBay (the price was reasonable, considering what my research showed) and I posted some interesting information along with the listing.  This was an odd item- a completely mechanical clock, yet made by a firm that specialized in battery powered electro-mechanical clocks.

The missing wiring was presumably hooked up to the Seth Thomas mechanism (this being a "master" clock) in such a way as to send an electrical "pulse" each second that would in turn move the dial on "slave" clocks in turn.

Albert L. Sohm held a number of clock patents, the last granted in 1922, and many additional patents for other things, relating to cash registers, power tools, and even radiator caps.

I found that a Sohm electro-mechanical clock had recently sold for $150 at auction, and since this clock was not electric, it probably was less interesting to collectors of these early clocks overall.
  some one got a ridiculous bargain. that clcock is completely seth thomas... modified by sohm. its the umbria model.  worth over 1200 bucks.
   with the sohm stuff on it it shouldnt have hurt its value at all. i wish i had seen that auction, but i search telechron too much these days.
 i got nauseous looking at the price. still have a tear in my eye. damn...........

 2 
 on: Today at 08:23:33 AM 
Started by tamtime - Last post by Boinker
Anyway - try some inexepensive reading glasses for a few bucks - might  surprise you....  Single focal length imho is easier on the eyes while working -

Absolutely!!  I just can't do closeup work with bifocals (either progressive or std). I need full magnification lenses for closeup work.

Here are two options (I have both of these and love them).
Full lens safety magnifiers:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=370355877917&var=640002744869&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT

High mag reading glasses:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380254436091&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT




as i work with progressives and built in loopes and fixed....
single diopter is the only way for clock work. (use loops with them if you need). larger the lens the better for more depth of field. and for protecting your eyes from flying debris.
cheap ones are the way to go. they get ruined. i hit my local dollar store and buy them 3 at a time if they have my strength. when scratched.. out they go.
my loops are actual scopes mounted permanently on a 3.25 diopter lens/frame.   i save it for the fine detail work.
  and as for light... i could never get used to the weight of these things henny talks about. Now,  i have many focused lights on my workbench that all come on at the same time. light is VERY important.
 the only headlight i ever really liked was an LED with a wired battery pack.   they are still real expensive though. i am gonna buy one this year, as i see i am gonna need them.
  age is a wonderful thing only when you can say " i got there".

 3 
 on: Today at 02:23:39 AM 
Started by dsadowski - Last post by OldTechFan
Hi dsadowsk - thanks for the sharing .  This is the link to the now closed auction:

http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-Sohm-Master-Regulator-Clock-Chicago-circa-1922-/160477923616?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item255d3ac920

Love to see you post these opportunities in our "Items to Watch" topic -

- cheers-
OTF

 4 
 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM 
Started by dsadowski - Last post by dsadowski
RARE Sohm Master Regulator Clock Chicago circa 1922 (eBay auction #160477923616)

I recently sold this clock on eBay (the price was reasonable, considering what my research showed) and I posted some interesting information along with the listing.  This was an odd item- a completely mechanical clock, yet made by a firm that specialized in battery powered electro-mechanical clocks.

The missing wiring was presumably hooked up to the Seth Thomas mechanism (this being a "master" clock) in such a way as to send an electrical "pulse" each second that would in turn move the dial on "slave" clocks in turn.

Albert L. Sohm held a number of clock patents, the last granted in 1922, and many additional patents for other things, relating to cash registers, power tools, and even radiator caps.

I found that a Sohm electro-mechanical clock had recently sold for $150 at auction, and since this clock was not electric, it probably was less interesting to collectors of these early clocks overall.

 5 
 on: Today at 12:48:08 AM 
Started by dsadowski - Last post by OldTechFan
Did a forumember get the badge ?  cheers

 6 
 on: Today at 12:42:08 AM 
Started by Dabeagle - Last post by shipnerd

The parts went through the ultrasonic cleaner, but I have to admit...if you look at the book there is a red/white paint scheme. Mine lacks that due to the solvent from the cleaner and the brittle paint. To be perfectly honest there wasn't much paint left, so I wasn't too unhappy about that, but I haven't decided if I want to go back and paint on the white and red bits, or leave them shiny.

I have a clock from Pappy on my bench. I should have known not to try working on something he decided was a tall order  shocked

Thanks for the comments Pappy and OTF!

Looks great! As for the keys, the only paint on them was the red paint on the key ends at the hour positions. The rest were bare metal. All you need to do is get some red paint and touch up the ends of those hour keys. Here are a couple closeups of mine to show what I mean.

 7 
 on: Today at 12:32:36 AM 
Started by tamtime - Last post by OldTechFan
 roll whistle

 8 
 on: Today at 12:28:03 AM 
Started by tamtime - Last post by shipnerd
Ah.... presbyopia - the universal common eyeailment  wink

Sounds like an ailment that afflicts Presbyterians!   laugh 

 9 
 on: September 08, 2010, 10:59:04 PM 
Started by tamtime - Last post by henny
Anyway - try some inexepensive reading glasses for a few bucks - might  surprise you....  Single focal length imho is easier on the eyes while working -

Absolutely!!  I just can't do closeup work with bifocals (either progressive or std). I need full magnification lenses for closeup work.

Here are two options (I have both of these and love them).
Full lens safety magnifiers:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=370355877917&var=640002744869&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT

High mag reading glasses:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380254436091&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT




 10 
 on: September 08, 2010, 10:56:13 PM 
Started by tamtime - Last post by tamtime
Ah.... presbyopia - the universal common eyeailment  wink.  I held for years - and still use single vision glasses - but did get a pair of prescription (-1.5 diopters I think) lenses for reading and closeup.  But I'm so nearsighted, I sometimes work without em...   excited...   Anyway - try some inexepensive reading glasses for a few bucks - might  surprise you....  Single focal length imho is easier on the eyes while working - as the middle corridor (that section between the far upper lens and the near lower lense on your progressive lenses) is small and that variance can be tricky to find the a comfortable working distance..
might try that... check em out at the store first....I have alot of astigmatism also, so I might end up with a table mount style.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!